Automation and integrations decision

IFTTT

A small, personal automation runner (webhooks, polling, HTTP/email/Docs actions, optional LLM) is realistic to build and maintain by a capable developer; reproducing IFTTT’s large catalog of integrations, mobile apps, and production scale is not practical for a solo builder.

Visit website
Subscription$2.99/month ✓ verified
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep6 hours + $20
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

What a replacement has to do

  • Run a trigger (webhook or polling), optionally query/transform data (small processor/LLM call), and execute one or more actions (HTTP requests, email, Google Docs append).

What it still won’t have

  • Catalog of 1,000+ pre-built service integrations
  • Mobile apps and polished multi-platform UX
  • Scale and reliability of a large production platform (25M users)
  • Pro+ developer platform features and prioritized support
  • Built-in rate limits and optimized polling infrastructure

What remains hard

  • Integration maintenanceWork smarter with 1,000+ services
  • Infrastructure at scaleExpose and expand the reach of your API to an ecosystem of 25M users, thousands of developers, and over 1,000 services.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 9 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted automation runner in Node.js (Express) + Postgres + a single-worker process. Implement: (1) a webhook endpoint to receive trigger payloads and persist events; (2) a scheduled polling worker supporting configurable intervals and polling sources; (3) a mapping layer that substitutes trigger ingredients into action templates; (4) action executors for HTTP POST, SMTP email, and Google Docs append (use Google APIs); (5) an optional LLM transformation step (call OpenAI-compatible API) selectable per Applet. Out of scope: building mobile apps, a marketplace of prebuilt connectors, multi-tenant billing, and a GUI beyond a minimal web form. Include input validation, retries/backoff for failed actions, logging, and unit/integration tests for triggers, mapping, and action execution.
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 60

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score60

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page