Cloud storage decision

IDrive

Keep paying — IDrive's durable advantages (large-scale storage economics, multi-region infrastructure, and compliance posture) are expensive and time-consuming to replicate for a small team.

Visit website
Subscription$0.25/month ✓ verified
Initial build80 hours
Monthly upkeep12 hours + $100
Evidence3/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

What a replacement has to do

  • Client-side incremental encrypted backup of selected files -> upload objects to object storage -> store metadata and versions in a database -> web UI to view/restore files and manage devices

What it still won’t have

  • Global multi-region storage footprint and provider-negotiated egress/ingress economics
  • Physical bulk transfer service (IDrive Express)
  • Out-of-the-box SOC2 / HIPAA attestation and compliance paperwork
  • Polished cross-platform native apps and long-term scaling/optimization

What remains hard

  • Infrastructure at scale90% cheaper than AWS Worldwide locations Immutable storage No fees for egress No fees for API calls
  • Compliance and regulationProtects against ransomware SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA Compliance
  • Brand trustIDrive ® secures 12 th PCMag Editors' choice award
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 434 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal encrypted cloud-backup service using: Go for backend, Postgres for metadata, MinIO (S3-compatible) for object storage, React for web UI, and an Electron/CLI client in Node.js. Core features in scope: client-side AES-256 encrypted incremental backup of a selected folder, resumable chunked uploads to S3, metadata API (device registry, file index, versions) with Postgres, web UI to list backups and trigger selective restores, background worker for snapshot retention and dedupe. Out of scope: physical bulk-shipping service, multi-region replication, formal SOC2/HIPAA attestation, mobile native apps. Include error handling, input validation, authentication (JWT + optional SSO), and unit + integration tests for API and client upload/restore paths.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 29

How the score was reached

  • Pay verdict base20
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-6
  • Evidence score29

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 3 moats quoted from the page