Customer support decision

Groove

A capable engineer can build a narrow subset (inbox + RAG-driven drafts + routing) cheaply, but reproducing Helply's full platform (many integrations, ROI attribution, enterprise onboarding, and production polish) is a much larger effort better suited to buying.

Visit website
You pay

$250/mo

$3,000/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$200/mo20 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Groove alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Receive customer messages, assemble account+KB context, generate AI draft or automated resolution, apply routing/escalation and record ticket outcomes

What it still won’t have

  • Per-ticket billing, enterprise contracts and onboarding handled by vendor
  • Pre-built integrations and connectors to many B2B systems
  • Vendor-provided ROI tracking, SLAs, and hands-on onboarding
  • Polish, monitoring, and reliability of a production SaaS platform

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal AI-native B2B support system using Node.js (Express), Postgres, and a retrieval-augmented LLM (OpenAI or compatible). In scope: (1) ingest email and a web chat webhook into a unified inbox; (2) fetch and attach account context from a mock CRM (Postgres table) and KB (vector index using pgvector); (3) implement RAG + prompt templates to produce reply drafts and a confidence score via the LLM API; (4) apply simple routing rules to assign or escalate tickets and tag churn/upsell signals; (5) record tickets, replies, and signals in Postgres and provide a small web UI to review drafts and send replies. Out of scope: enterprise billing, per-ticket metering UI, dozens of third-party connectors, advanced analytics dashboards. Include error handling, retries for external APIs, and unit tests for ingestion, RAG retrieval, and routing logic.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 67

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score67

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded