Cloud storage decision

Google One

A competent developer can build a useful, self‑hosted storage-plus-basic-AI workflow (backups, sharing, LLM summaries) in a few weeks, but reproducing Google's proprietary models, deep Google-app integrations, and multi‑TB global storage scale is not realistic.

Visit website
Subscription$1.99/month ✓ verified
Initial build80 hours
Monthly upkeep10 hours + $50
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Google One alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Provide extra cloud storage, back up device photos/files, share storage with a small group, and offer basic AI-assisted search/summaries via a third‑party model.

What it still won’t have

  • Proprietary Gemini model access and higher usage limits
  • Deep integrations across Gmail, Drive, Photos, Chrome, and other Google apps
  • Large-scale global storage infrastructure and multi‑TB plans by default
  • Bundled perks like YouTube Premium, Google Home Premium, and Google Health Premium

What remains hard

  • Integration maintenanceeverything working together across the Google apps you love.
  • Infrastructure at scaleStarting at 20 TB of storage
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 30 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal Google One–style service using: Next.js for the web UI, PostgreSQL for metadata, MinIO (S3-compatible) for object storage, and Docker for deployment. In scope: user sign-up/login (OAuth optional), upload/download/resumable uploads for photos and files, device backup endpoint (mobile client SDK not required), family sharing invites, a usage dashboard, and an AI feature that calls a 3rd‑party LLM API to return file summaries and simple search. Out of scope: training or hosting proprietary models, YouTube/Google Home/Health integrations, global multi-region object replication. Include error handling, input validation, authentication, basic automated tests (unit + end-to-end), and deployment scripts (Docker Compose or Kubernetes manifests).
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 25

How the score was reached

  • Pay verdict base20
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-6
  • Evidence score25

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page