Cloud storage decision

Google One

A competent developer can build a useful, self‑hosted storage-plus-basic-AI workflow (backups, sharing, LLM summaries) in a few weeks, but reproducing Google's proprietary models, deep Google-app integrations, and multi‑TB global storage scale is not realistic.

Visit website
You pay

$1.99/mo

$24/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$50/mo10 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 30 seats.

The code exists. It is not what you are paying for.

These 2 projects are real, published, and do the core job — and this page still says keep paying. What the subscription buys is integration maintenance and infrastructure at scale, and none of that ships in a repository. Fork one anyway if you want to. Go in knowing what it does not carry. What stays hard ↓ · All Google One alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Provide extra cloud storage, back up device photos/files, share storage with a small group, and offer basic AI-assisted search/summaries via a third‑party model.

What it still won’t have

  • Proprietary Gemini model access and higher usage limits
  • Deep integrations across Gmail, Drive, Photos, Chrome, and other Google apps
  • Large-scale global storage infrastructure and multi‑TB plans by default
  • Bundled perks like YouTube Premium, Google Home Premium, and Google Health Premium

What remains hard

  • Integration maintenanceeverything working together across the Google apps you love.
  • Infrastructure at scaleStarting at 20 TB of storage
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 30 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal Google One–style service using: Next.js for the web UI, PostgreSQL for metadata, MinIO (S3-compatible) for object storage, and Docker for deployment. In scope: user sign-up/login (OAuth optional), upload/download/resumable uploads for photos and files, device backup endpoint (mobile client SDK not required), family sharing invites, a usage dashboard, and an AI feature that calls a 3rd‑party LLM API to return file summaries and simple search. Out of scope: training or hosting proprietary models, YouTube/Google Home/Health integrations, global multi-region object replication. Include error handling, input validation, authentication, basic automated tests (unit + end-to-end), and deployment scripts (Docker Compose or Kubernetes manifests).
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 25

How the score was reached

  • Pay verdict base20
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-6
  • Evidence score25

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page