Forms and surveys decision

Fillout

A capable developer can reproduce a useful, self-hosted form builder (collection, logic, embeds, PDF) in ~30 hours, but matching Fillout's enterprise compliance, ecosystem of integrations, and polish is costly — keep paying for those unless you only need a basic intake workflow.

Visit website
Subscription$15/month ✓ verified
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep8 hours + $0
Evidence3/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

What a replacement has to do

  • Collect form responses, apply conditional logic/workflows, store results, and embed/share forms.

What it still won’t have

  • SOC II Type II compliance and associated audit artifacts
  • 50+ native integrations and prebuilt connectors
  • Enterprise features (SSO, audit logs, dedicated support, SLA)
  • Advanced analytics, conversion kit and high-volume scaling
  • Polished UI/UX and marketplace trust

What remains hard

  • Compliance and regulationSOC II Type 2 Compliant 256-bit AES Data encryption 24/5 Support. Here if you need us
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted form builder using React for the frontend, Node.js + Express for the API, and Postgres for storage. Implement: (1) a form schema editor and renderer supporting 50+ field types, validation, multi-page forms and conditional visibility; (2) an API to create/update/query form schemas and submissions; (3) a rule engine to evaluate conditional logic and route respondents; (4) an embeddable script to render forms on other sites and support a custom domain; (5) server-side PDF generation of submissions and a webhook outgoing integration. Out of scope: enterprise SSO, SOC II attestation, and 50+ native third-party adapters. Include error handling, input validation, auth for an admin UI, and automated tests for API endpoints and rule evaluation.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 64

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score64

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page