Analytics and monitoring decision

figoca

A technically competent developer can build a useful comps+grader+extension workflow, but reproducing figoca's indexed dataset, scale, and polished product experience would be difficult to match and justifies continued use of the paid product for full coverage.

Visit website
You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off64 h to build

$100/mo6 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All figoca alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • User snaps or uploads card photos → system returns PSA-style grade estimate → user searches comps (real eBay sold listings) → view deal indicators and price history → optionally save to portfolio; Chrome extension overlays comps on eBay listings.

What it still won’t have

  • Scale and breadth of indexed eBay listings (8M+ indexed claim)
  • Proprietary historical pricing dataset and freshness at scale
  • Polished UX, brand trust, and community traction
  • Investor-grade metrics and growth resources

What remains hard

  • Proprietary data8M+ listings indexed, 36k+ AI grades delivered, +156% new users in the last 30 days. See the full story and metrics.
  • Infrastructure at scale8M+ listings indexed, 36k+ AI grades delivered, +156% new users in the last 30 days. See the full story and metrics.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

figoca does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal figoca replacement using: React frontend, Node.js (Express) API, Postgres, Redis for job queue, and a hosted vision model API (e.g., OpenAI/Replicate) for grading. In scope: (1) a scraper/connector that pulls recent eBay sold listings into Postgres and builds a simple search index; (2) an image upload endpoint that runs uploaded card photos through the hosted vision model and returns PSA-style grade probabilities plus sub‑grade checks; (3) a search UI showing recent sold comps, price history sparkline, and a deal-over/under indicator; (4) user portfolio CRUD with import/export CSV; (5) a Chrome extension that injects an overlay onto eBay listing pages calling the search API. Out of scope: large-scale crawling/parallelization, advanced trend dashboards, multi-tenant billing, and mobile apps. Include error handling, retries for external APIs, background jobs for indexing, basic unit and integration tests, and Docker-based deployment scripts.
How we checked3 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 58

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-6
  • Evidence score58

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page