Uncategorised decision

EuroAlternative

A small technical team or single developer can build and maintain a usable curated alternatives directory in about a week; EuroAlternative's value is audience/brand and curation rather than technical complexity, so self-hosting a replacement is realistic.

Visit website

Built by Piotr Kulpinski, who ships 4 products in this index

You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off34 h to build

$15/mo3 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • User browses and searches a curated directory of European software, filters by category/country/collection, views provider detail pages, and subscribes for updates.

What it still won’t have

  • Brand recognition and existing audience/traffic
  • Curatorial editorial voice and existing curated collections
  • Any commercial relationships, advertising placements, or affiliate integrations the site has

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

EuroAlternative does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a lightweight web directory in Node.js (Express) + Postgres + Next.js for frontend. Implement: (1) an admin CRUD UI to create Providers, Categories, Countries, Collections, Tags; (2) public listing pages with pagination and faceted filters (category, country, collection, tags); (3) provider detail pages with logo, description, and 'European Alternative to' field; (4) full-text search using Meilisearch (or Postgres full-text) integrated with filters; (5) newsletter subscription using a Mail provider API; (6) deploy to a single VPS or platform (e.g., DigitalOcean), automated CI deploy, HTTPS, and basic privacy-first analytics (Matomo or simple cookieless). Out of scope: payments, advertising marketplace, multi-tenant accounts, and personalized recommendations. Include error handling, input validation, tests for core APIs, and docs for deploy and backup procedures.
How we checked3 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 85

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score85

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded