Websites and hosting decision

Duda

A single-site builder with AI copy generation and a publish flow is realistic for a small team to build and maintain, but matching Duda’s multi-tenant scale, AWS-backed hosting, white-label platform features, and integrations ecosystem is not practical to reproduce quickly.

Visit website
Subscription$25/month ✓ verified
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep8 hours + $50
Evidence3/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Duda alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Allow an agency to create, publish, and manage a single customizable website with template-based pages, a CMS for content, and simple AI-driven content generation (prompts → page content).

What it still won’t have

  • AWS-backed multi-tenant hosting at Duda scale and SLAs
  • White-label platform features and account-level multi-site management
  • Built-in AEO / AI Visibility add-on and agentic SEO integrations
  • Award-winning support, account managers, and enterprise compliance features
  • Mature Zapier/MCP integrations and app store ecosystem

What remains hard

  • Infrastructure at scalePublish sites you can depend on with ultra-reliable AWS hosting, enterprise-grade security, automatic backups, and no technical ongoing maintenance.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 3 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a single-tenant website builder and publisher using Next.js (React) frontend, a Postgres database, and S3-compatible object storage; use Vercel or an equivalent for hosting the frontend and Cloudflare CDN for assets. Implement: (1) a drag-and-drop template editor with save/load, (2) a CMS with pages and collections stored in Postgres, (3) an export/build pipeline that renders pages to static HTML and uploads assets to the CDN, (4) user auth and simple role permissions, (5) a REST API to create/update sites/pages, and (6) an LLM integration endpoint (configurable API key) to generate page copy from prompts. Out of scope: multi-account white-label platform, enterprise SLAs, multi-site billing, and an app marketplace. Include error handling, retries for external API calls, unit tests for core business logic, and end-to-end tests for the publish flow.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 64

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score64

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page