Websites and hosting decision

DigitalOcean App Platform

A small, opinionated PaaS for personal projects or low-scale apps is feasible to build and maintain by a developer, but reproducing DigitalOcean App Platform's scale, owned infrastructure optimizations, and production polish is not practical.

Visit website
Subscription$5/month
Initial build80 hours
Monthly upkeep8 hours + $4
Evidence3/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

What a replacement has to do

  • Accept Git push → build image (or use Dockerfile) → run container on VM/Kubernetes → provide TLS + domain + load balancing → collect logs/metrics and scale instances.

What it still won’t have

  • Managed autoscaling and production-ready scaling policies
  • Integrated team/billing/GUI and one-bill experience
  • Deep infrastructure optimizations (GPU/AI stack, owned silicon)
  • Enterprise support, managed backups, and built-in integrations

What remains hard

  • Infrastructure at scaleWe own the silicon. Your unit economics improve as you scale.
  • Execution qualityOne CLI. One API. One bill. Migrate in one line of code, and leave on the same terms.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 3 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted App Platform PaaS using: Docker, a single Ubuntu Droplet (or small VM), Nginx (reverse proxy), Docker Registry (or Docker Hub), systemd (or docker-compose) for process management, Certbot for TLS, and a small Node/Express dashboard. Features in scope: Git webhook endpoint that triggers a build, build+push container image, pull and run container on the VM, route domains with automatic Let's Encrypt TLS, basic health checks and restart on crash, and collection of container logs to files. Out of scope: multi-node scheduling, advanced autoscaling, integrated billing, managed databases, and GPU/AI inference. Include error handling, retries for builds/pulls, and unit/integration tests for the webhook, build, and deploy steps.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 61

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score61

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! Price not confirmed on the page — this pricing page renders its price in the browser✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page