Project and task management decision

CleanMyMac

A competent developer can build a useful local Mac cleaner/uninstaller in about a week and maintain it, but reproducing MacPaw's full product (antivirus, ongoing threat updates, cross-mac compatibility, and marketplace distribution) is not realistic for a solo DIY effort.

Visit website
You pay

$3.33/mo

$40/yr

Not verified against a pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$50one-off30 h to build

$0/mo8 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

The code exists. It is not what you are paying for.

These 2 projects are real, published, and do the core job — and this page still says keep paying. What the subscription buys is marketplace liquidity, and none of that ships in a repository. Fork one anyway if you want to. Go in knowing what it does not carry. What stays hard ↓ · All CleanMyMac alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Scan filesystem for reclaimable files, present safe-to-delete groups, delete selected items, uninstall apps and leftovers, and show disk-usage report.

What it still won’t have

  • MacPaw's proprietary threat detection and ongoing malware signature/engine updates
  • Vendor-provided notarization, code signing, and platform compatibility testing across macOS releases
  • Tightly integrated paid features and support/updates bundled by MacPaw
  • Setapp distribution and any marketplace subscription bundling

What remains hard

  • Marketplace liquiditySetapp is a marketplace where developers and users connect. Users get high-quality, ad-free tools while developers receive steady, predictable revenue without spending money and effort on marketing.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a native macOS app (Swift + SwiftUI, use FileManager and command-line helpers) that scans user home and common system cache locations, computes disk usage, identifies large files and common cache/log locations, detects duplicate files by hashing, presents results in a paginated UI, lets users mark groups and performs deletions with move-to-trash and permission escalation via Apple APIs. In scope: disk-usage scanner, duplicate detector (file hashing), safe delete with undo/trash, app uninstaller that removes .app bundles and common leftover folders, SwiftUI frontend, notarization-ready signing instructions, automated tests for scanning and deletion logic, error handling and user confirmations. Out of scope: building a malware engine, AV signature updates, cloud sync, enterprise licensing, and integrating with Setapp. Include unit tests, CI for signing/notarization steps, and clear logging and recoverable error paths.
How we checked4 sources · 1/3 runs agreed · evidence score 25

How the score was reached

  • Pay verdict base20
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score25

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! Price not confirmed on the page - this pricing page renders its price in the browser! 1 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict was then capped by the evidence below✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page