Learning and careers decision

Chessigma

A competent technical user can reproduce the core free analysis and report features in about one week and maintain them cheaply; the hosted product's coach/premium polish would remain the main difference.

Visit website

Built by Mehdi Ben Haddou, who ships 3 products in this index

You pay

$14/mo

$168/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off38 h to build

$40/mo3 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 4 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Chessigma alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • User imports or fetches games → run Stockfish analysis on each move → compute centipawn loss and grade moves → render interactive board, evaluation graph and per-game report → optionally save reports for the user.

What it still won’t have

  • Polished AI Supercoach chat and training modules
  • Curated puzzles, leaderboards and community features
  • Founding-class perks and guarantees
  • Marketing, UX polish and reliability of the hosted product

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 4 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted chess-analysis web app using Next.js (React) frontend, Node/Express backend, Postgres for storage, and Stockfish 17 via WASM (client-side) or a server-side CPU worker. Core features in-scope: fetch games from Lichess and Chess.com public APIs and accept PGN upload; run per-move Stockfish analysis and compute centipawn loss and move grades; auto-detect openings; generate and store per-game reports; interactive analysis board with move navigation and evaluation graph; user account and saved-username support. Out of scope: AI chat coach, paid subscription flow, puzzles, leaderboards, and advanced training modules. Require: error handling for provider API failures and malformed PGNs, authentication, basic tests for import/analysis/report generation, and deployment scripts (Docker + cloud VPS).
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 89

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score89

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded