Project and task management decision

Canny

A small team can reproduce the core feedback board, voting, widget, and changelog in ~1 week, but Canny's value relies on Autopilot AI, broad integrations, enterprise features, and scale—difficult to match by DIY.

Visit website
Subscription$79/month ✓ verified
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep8 hours + $50
Evidence3/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Canny alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Collect customer feedback into boards, let users create/vote/comment on posts, maintain an admin UI to triage and change post status, embed a feedback widget into a website or app, and export reports or send updates (changelog/notifications).

What it still won’t have

  • Autopilot AI that automatically captures and deduplicates feedback from support/sales conversations
  • Built-in integrations catalogue (Intercom, Zendesk, Gong, Zoom, CRM/PM tools)
  • Enterprise features and compliance attestations (SSO, SOC 2, invoicing, high tracked-user limits)
  • Scale, polished UX, and brand trust of the hosted product

What remains hard

  • Infrastructure at scale100K+ registered companies
  • Compliance and regulationSOC 2 Pay by invoice Security review
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a lightweight self-hosted feedback board using PostgreSQL, Node.js (Express) backend, React frontend, and a small SMTP/email provider. Implement: (1) Post, Comment, Vote, Board models in Postgres with authentication (email + password). (2) Admin UI to triage posts, set status, and create changelog entries. (3) Public board UI with post creation, voting, and commenting. (4) Embeddable JS widget exposing create/vote actions. (5) Background job to send status update emails and CSV export endpoint. Out of scope: AI autopilot ingestion from external support tools, enterprise SSO, and SOC2 compliance. Include input validation, error handling, tests for API and core UI flows, and docker-compose for local deployment.
How we checked4 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 61

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-6
  • Evidence score61

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page