Project and task management decision

Bonsai

Build a narrow, self-hosted workflow (clients + time + invoices + payments) — realistic for a small technical team using existing OSS components — but reproducing Bonsai’s full integrations, polish, mobile apps, and enterprise support is not practical for a solo developer.

Visit website
You pay

$15/mo

$180/yr

Per seat. Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$20/mo8 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Bonsai alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Manage clients and projects, track time, generate invoices and accept payments, and publish simple proposals/contracts.

What it still won’t have

  • Years of integration partnerships (Zapier, QuickBooks, Xero, Calendly) and maintained connectors
  • Polished, battle-tested UI/UX and mobile apps
  • Enterprise onboarding, dedicated support, and SLA-backed uptime
  • Advanced reporting, resource planning, and proprietary templates
  • Scale reliability and mitigations for payment processing edge cases

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted minimal Bonsai clone using a PostgreSQL database, Node.js (Express) backend, Next.js frontend, and Stripe for payments. Core features in scope: user auth and per-user accounts; client and project CRUD; time entry UI + timesheet aggregation; generate invoice PDFs from templates and accept Stripe payments; simple proposal/contract editor with PDF export; basic reporting (revenue by project). Out of scope: multi-tenant enterprise onboarding, mobile apps, third-party connector marketplace, advanced resource planning, and accounting sync. Deliver automated tests for API endpoints, PDF generation, and payment flows; include error handling for failed payments, concurrency on timesheet edits, and documented deployment scripts (Docker + managed Postgres + object storage).
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 67

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score67

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded