Security and privacy decision

Blurweb

A competent developer can build and maintain a useful replacement (content scripts + small backend + Stripe) within a few weeks; vendor advantages are modest (install base/brand) and not an insurmountable moat.

Visit website
You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off64 h to build

$50/mo4 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Blurweb alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • User installs extension → select/paint elements or click to blur → extension applies CSS/Canvas blur in-page → optional 'keep blur' persists rule and syncs with account.

What it still won’t have

  • Polish and cross-browser QA of a mature commercial extension
  • Established user trust, reviews and marketplace listing momentum
  • Ongoing product updates and customer support responsiveness
  • Analytics and aggregated usage telemetry provided by vendor

What remains hard

  • Brand trustTrusted by 10000+ People Just like you, Using on sites like:
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

Blurweb does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a cross-browser WebExtension in TypeScript: use React for the popup/options UI, a content script to implement element hover/select, single-click blur, and a rectangular-draw blur tool; persist rules locally (IndexedDB) and implement a minimal Node/Express + Postgres backend with endpoints for license activation/deactivation and optional rule sync; integrate Stripe Checkout for one-time license purchases and provide simple account pages (activate/deactivate devices). In scope: content-script blur logic, UI, local persistence, backend licensing API, Stripe integration, tests (unit for core logic, e2e for install+blur flow), error handling and packaging for Chrome/Edge/Firefox. Out of scope: native apps, blurring browser UI/URL bar, large-scale analytics or enterprise SSO. Provide CI to build browser bundles and automated tests.
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 63

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score63

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page