Cloud storage decision

Backblaze Personal Backup

A small, useful backup workflow (agent that uploads encrypted files to S3-compatible storage plus a restore UI) is realistic for a competent developer, but reproducing Backblaze’s full offering (scale, unlimited-plan economics, mailed drive restores, and polished multi-OS clients) is operationally heavy and out of scope for a single developer.

Visit website
You pay

$8.25/mo

$99/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$5/mo8 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Backblaze Personal Backup alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Continuously detect changed files on a user's computer, deduplicate/chunk and encrypt them, upload chunks to S3-compatible object storage, store metadata and version history in a small database, and provide restore/download UI.

What it still won’t have

  • Large-scale storage infrastructure and operational reliability at Backblaze scale
  • Mailed hard drive restore service and related logistics
  • Guaranteed unlimited-plan economics and enterprise care
  • Polished native clients maintained for many OS versions

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal cross-platform backup service using Electron (or native frameworks), Rust/Go agent for efficient file scanning, chunking, and client-side AES encryption; store chunks on an S3-compatible backend (e.g., Backblaze B2) and metadata in Postgres. In scope: file discovery and change detection, chunking+optional dedupe, resumable encrypted uploads, metadata/versioning API, basic web UI/CLI for listing and restoring files, and automated tests for core flows. Out of scope: mailed hard-drive restore logistics, enterprise multi-tenant admin console, and commercial billing. Include error handling, retry/backoff for uploads, telemetry for failed restores, and unit/integration tests for upload/download and metadata consistency.
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 63

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score63

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded