Cloud storage decision

Backblaze Personal Backup

A small, useful backup workflow (agent that uploads encrypted files to S3-compatible storage plus a restore UI) is realistic for a competent developer, but reproducing Backblaze’s full offering (scale, unlimited-plan economics, mailed drive restores, and polished multi-OS clients) is operationally heavy and out of scope for a single developer.

Visit website
Subscription$8.25/month ✓ verified
Initial build80 hours
Monthly upkeep8 hours + $5
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

What a replacement has to do

  • Continuously detect changed files on a user's computer, deduplicate/chunk and encrypt them, upload chunks to S3-compatible object storage, store metadata and version history in a small database, and provide restore/download UI.

What it still won’t have

  • Large-scale storage infrastructure and operational reliability at Backblaze scale
  • Mailed hard drive restore service and related logistics
  • Guaranteed unlimited-plan economics and enterprise care
  • Polished native clients maintained for many OS versions

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal cross-platform backup service using Electron (or native frameworks), Rust/Go agent for efficient file scanning, chunking, and client-side AES encryption; store chunks on an S3-compatible backend (e.g., Backblaze B2) and metadata in Postgres. In scope: file discovery and change detection, chunking+optional dedupe, resumable encrypted uploads, metadata/versioning API, basic web UI/CLI for listing and restoring files, and automated tests for core flows. Out of scope: mailed hard-drive restore logistics, enterprise multi-tenant admin console, and commercial billing. Include error handling, retry/backoff for uploads, telemetry for failed restores, and unit/integration tests for upload/download and metadata consistency.
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 63

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score63

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded