Analytics and monitoring decision

ArtificialWatch

A competent developer can reproduce the core alerting/watchlist functionality in about a week and maintain it for small-scale use; the product's value-add (phone-call alarm and evaluation harness) can be approximated but not fully replaced without extra engineering.

Visit website
Subscription$12/month ✓ verified
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep6 hours + $25
Evidence2/3 runs agree

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Poll provider APIs on a schedule, detect a newly-answering model by issuing a test prompt and confirming on a second sweep, send notifications (email/Chrome push free; SMS/phone via paid channels), store and manage user watchlists and per-model routing, display a minimal dashboard with recent detections

What it still won’t have

  • built-in charter pricing and lifetime guarantees
  • the Call/Watchtower specialized evaluation harness and regression history
  • polished product UX and public track record
  • any proprietary subscriptions or negotiated SMS/voice volume discounts

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 3 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal AI-model-launch watcher using Node.js (Express) + Postgres + Redis (for job locks) and a single-worker cron. Core features in scope: 1) a scheduled poller that queries a configurable list of provider APIs every 60s and stores responses; 2) deduplication and confirmation logic that requires a second successful detection before emitting an alert; 3) a test-prompt runner to validate a model answers; 4) user accounts, per-user watchlists, and per-model channel routing preferences; 5) notification integrations: email (SMTP), Chrome push (Web Push), and Twilio for SMS and automated calls; 6) a small React dashboard to manage watchlists and show recent alerts. Out of scope: building a large-scale provider catalog, automated model benchmarking/harness (Watchtower), and Polymarket integration. Require error handling for API failures and rate limits, retries with backoff, unit tests for detection logic, and end-to-end tests for the notification pipeline.
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 84

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score84

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded