Analytics and monitoring decision

Analyse

Buildable for a technical user to reproduce the analytics and basic SEO-draft automation, but the full polished product (AI copilot, MCP server, rank-tracking, publishing polish and team features) is larger and would take more engineering to match the paid offering.

Visit website
You pay

$29/mo

$348/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off63 h to build

$120/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 5 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Analyse alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Collect site events, ingest Search Console data, schedule LLM-driven SEO drafts, and publish to CMS

What it still won’t have

  • Polished, integrated AI+analytics UX and product polish
  • Built-in rank-tracking, alerting, and multi-site scaling that the SaaS includes
  • Proprietary training data, curated SEO prompts, and any internal MCP server optimizations
  • Priority support, SLAs, and team-oriented features (SSO, white-label, dedicated CSM)

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 5 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal, self-hosted privacy-first analytics + SEO draft generator using Next.js for the frontend, Node/Express for the API, Postgres for events and metadata, BullMQ (Redis) for scheduled jobs, and OpenAI-compatible API for LLM calls. Core features in scope: (1) a lightweight client tracking script and events ingestion endpoint, (2) basic funnel and retention queries + a small React dashboard to show funnels/cohorts, (3) Google Search Console ingestion job and mapping to pages, (4) scheduled job that generates an article draft via the LLM API using page + GSC context and saves drafts to DB, (5) one-click publish to WordPress/Ghost via REST API and an approval UI. Out of scope: building a custom LLM, full rank-tracking system, multi-tenant billing, enterprise SSO, and advanced IR/ML pipelines. Include environment configuration, error handling, retries, unit tests for API endpoints, and an integration test for the publish flow.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 67

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score67

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded