Automation and integrations decision
Activepieces Cloud
A single developer or small team can reproduce the core flow-authoring and execution loop, but building the full hosted product (enterprise governance, hundreds of integrations, billing/credits, managed compliance, and support) is substantial—so keep paying for those capabilities unless you only need a narrow self-hosted flow runner.
Visit website↗$16/mo
$192/yr
Read off the official pricing page.
$100one-off80 h to build
$50/mo10 h/mo upkeep
On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 4 seats.
Open-source builds that already do this
Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Activepieces Cloud alternatives, with the arithmetic →
Code Activepieces Cloud publishes itself
Not a way out of the subscription - these are the vendor’s own repositories. Worth a look for how they build, and for anything you would have to integrate with.
What a replacement has to do
- Create a flow with triggers and actions, persist the flow, run worker(s) that execute steps when triggers fire, call external APIs (including AI provider) from action steps, and surface run status/results in a web UI.
What it still won’t have
- Hosted enterprise features (SSO, SCIM, audit logs, secrets managers, dedicated workers)
- 700+ prebuilt integrations and community-contributed pieces
- Built-in credit metering, billing, and support from vendor
- Embeddable builder, branding, Git Sync and release tooling
- SOC 2 Type II managed compliance and hosted SLA
What remains hard
- Product polish and ongoing maintenance
First-year cost
Keep paying
Paying is—cheaper in year one.
On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 4 seats.
Money you would actually spend
Time you would spend
—
What you would spend
What we assumed
The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.
Runnable build prompt
Build a minimal self-hosted automation platform: use React for the UI, Node.js + TypeScript for backend, Postgres for persistent storage, Redis + BullMQ for job queuing, and Docker for deployment. Implement: 1) a flow authoring UI that saves flow JSON to Postgres; 2) an HTTP/webhook trigger endpoint that enqueues runs; 3) a worker that executes steps (supporting at least HTTP action, delay, and an AI action that calls OpenAI-compatible APIs using a user-provided key); 4) run history and basic retry/error handling; 5) JWT-based auth and a single admin/builder RBAC. Out of scope: SSO/SCIM, audit logs, enterprise billing, embedding SDKs, and implementing >10 third-party connectors. Include automated tests for core execution logic and error paths, sensible logging, and Docker Compose for local dev.
How we checked
How the score was reached
- Partly verdict base52
- An open-source build was found+5
- 5 cited sources+3
- Price verified on pricing page+3
- 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
- Evidence score67
The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.
How scoring works →Cited sources · 5
Every page the run actually retrieved.
- official productActivepieces
- official pricingActivepieces Pricing
- official docsActivepieces Docs - Welcome
- open sourcen8n-io/n8n
- open sourceactivepieces/activepieces
Integrity checks
What held up, and what did not.
