Security and privacy decision

1Password

A competent engineer can implement a useful, smaller replacement for core secret storage and runtime retrieval, but reproducing 1Password's enterprise certifications, integrations, audit pedigree, cross-platform clients, and brand trust is impractical for a DIY rebuild.

Visit website
Subscription$2.99/month
Initial build80 hours
Monthly upkeep12 hours + $0
Evidence3/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All 1Password alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Store encrypted secrets in per-team vaults, grant/revoke access by role, retrieve secrets at runtime (CLI/SDK/web), and produce audit logs for accesses.

What it still won’t have

  • Independent security audits, certifications, and bug-bounty backing
  • Enterprise sales/onboarding and dedicated account management
  • Large catalogue of prebuilt enterprise integrations and marketplace
  • Cross-platform native apps and polished browser extensions
  • Brand reputation and enterprise trust signals

What remains hard

  • Brand trust2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for SaaS Management Platforms 1Password named a Leader for SaaS Management Platforms
  • Compliance and regulationwe're certified to SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, and more.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 3 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal team secrets manager using: React web UI, Node.js (Express) API, Postgres, and libsodium/crypto (or WebCrypto) for client-side AES-256 encryption. Core features in scope: (1) account creation with master password + device secret and local key derivation, (2) encrypted vault item CRUD with server storing only ciphertext + metadata, (3) role-based access control with SSO/OIDC integration (Okta or Google) and SCIM provisioning stub, (4) runtime secret retrieval via authenticated CLI and an events stream (webhook endpoint) for audit logging, (5) basic web UI to share/manage vaults and items. Out of scope: native mobile apps, browser extensions, advanced PAM/JIT session brokering, marketplace integrations, formal security certifications. Include input validation, error handling, unit and integration tests for crypto and ACL flows, and deployment manifests for Docker + a single VPS (DigitalOcean) with automated backups.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 61

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score61

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! Price not confirmed on the page - this pricing page renders its price in the browser✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page