Security and privacy decision

1Lookup

A competent developer can replicate basic phone/email/IP validation and a billing-lite service in about a week, but cannot easily reproduce 1Lookup's direct FCC/carrier data access, breadth of enrichment products, and enterprise-grade performance/support.

Visit website
You pay

$99/mo

$1,188/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$50one-off30 h to build

$50/mo5 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Accept an identifier (phone, email, or IP) → run validation/enrichment checks (syntax, MX/SMTP, port/geolocation, carrier/HLR where available) → return risk/confidence score and structured metadata.

What it still won’t have

  • Direct FCC & carrier data access (daily-updated carrier/FCC feeds)
  • Single universal credit system and bundled multi-product catalog
  • Enterprise SLA, dedicated CSM and priority support
  • Scale-tested <300ms validation performance and global coverage out of the box
  • Advanced enrichment products (firmographics, skip-trace, mobile finder) and unified billing

What remains hard

  • Proprietary dataThe only verification platform with direct FCC access. Built for businesses like yours.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted data verification microservice using Node.js + Express, PostgreSQL, and a worker queue (Bull or similar). Implement REST endpoints: /validate/email, /validate/phone, /lookup/ip. In scope: phone normalization via libphonenumber, email syntax+MX lookup, optional SMTP mailbox liveness probe (configurable with concurrency limits), IP geolocation via a pluggable provider (require the operator to supply an API key), risk scoring composed from the above signals, request logging to Postgres, and a simple web dashboard showing usage and recent lookups. Out of scope: direct FCC/ carrier HLR access, enterprise SLA, advanced enrichment products (firmographics, skip-trace), audio transcription. Require error handling for timeouts and provider failures, input validation, retries with backoff, unit and integration tests, Dockerfiles for service and Postgres, and a README with deployment steps and cost estimates.
How we checked3 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 55

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score55

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page