Security and privacy decision

1Lookup

A competent developer can replicate basic phone/email/IP validation and a billing-lite service in about a week, but cannot easily reproduce 1Lookup's direct FCC/carrier data access, breadth of enrichment products, and enterprise-grade performance/support.

Visit website
Subscription$99/month ✓ verified
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep5 hours + $50
Evidence2/3 runs agree

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Accept an identifier (phone, email, or IP) → run validation/enrichment checks (syntax, MX/SMTP, port/geolocation, carrier/HLR where available) → return risk/confidence score and structured metadata.

What it still won’t have

  • Direct FCC & carrier data access (daily-updated carrier/FCC feeds)
  • Single universal credit system and bundled multi-product catalog
  • Enterprise SLA, dedicated CSM and priority support
  • Scale-tested <300ms validation performance and global coverage out of the box
  • Advanced enrichment products (firmographics, skip-trace, mobile finder) and unified billing

What remains hard

  • Proprietary dataThe only verification platform with direct FCC access. Built for businesses like yours.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted data verification microservice using Node.js + Express, PostgreSQL, and a worker queue (Bull or similar). Implement REST endpoints: /validate/email, /validate/phone, /lookup/ip. In scope: phone normalization via libphonenumber, email syntax+MX lookup, optional SMTP mailbox liveness probe (configurable with concurrency limits), IP geolocation via a pluggable provider (require the operator to supply an API key), risk scoring composed from the above signals, request logging to Postgres, and a simple web dashboard showing usage and recent lookups. Out of scope: direct FCC/ carrier HLR access, enterprise SLA, advanced enrichment products (firmographics, skip-trace), audio transcription. Require error handling for timeouts and provider failures, input validation, retries with backoff, unit and integration tests, Dockerfiles for service and Postgres, and a README with deployment steps and cost estimates.
How we checked3 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 55

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score55

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page